I am dumbfounded.. Course I guess it's just being from the US but with SHAI , anything which is "over the age of consent" , regardless of how it appears, makes the age restrictions on the character null-able . I get the whole appearance thing regarding the 'looks' and 'feel' of the graphic doll , but in all honesty who cares. Legitimate "art" of actual nude children is not considered illegal, albeit in my opinion unethical, lewd, and distasteful - but if a character in a game is incapable of engaging in sexual activities - it is considered non sexual. Nudity itself is not the problem, its when sex is brought into the gambit. And the game, as far as I know, has no actual sexual content. Now - if it were mod'ed outside of it's original intentions - say like skyrim for example, that's a whole different story when considering 'loli' looking actors.
Appearance isn't everything, and if it's over 30 in life years per story line, it's definately not loli
So why isn't it being included in the patch? Because someone might get offended? lol... To some, any alteration in a game's design to include nudity is offensive.. You can't fix what can't be fixed, which includes people that consider nudity to be perverted and profane. Personally, I hate the forced leggings and wrappings of some of the armors, and the removal of those items makes the playable characters look a heck of alot better. I keep the armor sets, just remove all the extra 'junk'
I can add about another 100 examples.. First one is led zepplin houses of the holy, second is blind faith - blind faith album covers.. Just want to make it clear that I am giving examples of what I mean here and not posting something pornographic, as they were internationally released (and of course banned in some countries just for the picture)